A change order updates a construction contract when scope, cost, or time shifts. Learn how to manage types, triggers, approvals, and project impacts effectively.
Free Change Order Template. Ready to use Microsoft Excel format for construction change orders.
No matter how well a project is planned, something always shifts: scope, cost, timeline, or all three. When that happens, a change order is the official way to update the contract and keep the project moving.
But managing change orders isn’t just about paperwork. It affects your budget, your schedule, and your team’s time. If you get it wrong, things can snowball fast. That’s why knowing how change orders work and how to stay on top of them is essential.
A change order is a written agreement that updates the original construction contract. It lets you change the contractor’s scope of work, the price, the timeline, or all three. For the change to be valid, both the owner and contractor must agree in writing.
Most change orders involve extra work. Think adding a window, moving a wall, or upgrading finishes. These are called additive change orders. Others remove work to save time or money. Those are deductive.
Either way, change orders exist because no project goes exactly as planned. When conditions shift or designs evolve, change orders help you adjust without derailing the job.
The purpose of a change order goes beyond updating a contract. It’s a critical tool for maintaining alignment, clarity, and legal protection on a construction project. Change orders:
In short, a change order formalizes project flexibility while maintaining structure and accountability.
Change orders aren’t one-size-fits-all. Some add work, others cut it. Some shift the schedule, while others just clarify what needs to be built.
Each one plays a different role, so it’s worth understanding how they work. That way, your team can respond faster and avoid surprises.
Here are the most common types:
You need a change order any time the agreed scope, price, or timeline of your project is going to change, especially if those changes happen after the contract has been signed. There are two common triggers:
Change orders can be initiated by either the project owner or the construction contractor, depending on who identifies the need for a change. In some cases, the architect or engineer also plays a key role in initiating or documenting the change. Each party may start the process through a different document or method, depending on the situation.
Here are the common ways change orders are initiated:
Typically issued by the architect, a proposal request asks the contractor to provide pricing and schedule implications for a requested change. It’s often used to explore options or address anticipated issues before authorizing work.
An ASI provides additional details or minor changes to the contract documents. These are intended to have no impact on the contract price or timeline. If they do, a change order is required to formalize the adjustment.
A CCD allows the owner to direct the contractor to proceed with changes immediately, even if there’s no agreement yet on cost or time. It’s a temporary step used when delays aren’t an option. A formal change order follows once terms are settled.
When contract documents are unclear or inconsistent, the contractor may submit an RFI. If the clarification results in a scope change or method of work, a change order is created to document that impact.
A COR is submitted by the contractor to propose a change in scope, cost, or schedule. It may be triggered by a PR, ASI, or CCD, or it can be initiated directly in response to site conditions, design conflicts, or material availability.
Here are the most common ones you’ll run into on a construction project.
Clients often want to change or add features after construction has already started. This could be due to personal preference, new needs, or simply seeing the space and rethinking things. These changes usually go beyond what was originally agreed on in the contract.
Example: The client decides to add built-in benches and planter boxes in the outdoor area. This extra work wasn’t part of the original design or budget.
Plans aren’t always perfect. Sometimes there are gaps, conflicts between trades, or things that don’t quite work once construction begins. Other times, the design team updates the original plan to reflect new decisions or feedback.
Example: The interior designer updates the ceiling layout to improve acoustics in a shared office space. That change affects HVAC ducting, lighting, and sprinkler placement.
These are problems you couldn’t have known about until work began. They often involve existing site conditions. Since they weren’t visible or documented, they weren’t included in the original scope.
Example: Excavation reveals a large buried concrete slab from a previous structure that wasn’t on any drawings. Removing it takes extra time and equipment.
Sometimes local authorities update rules mid-project. Even if the project was approved under older codes, new inspections may require updated work to meet the latest standards.
Example: New environmental regulations take effect, requiring upgraded insulation for energy efficiency. The team has to order new materials and revise installation methods.
The project timeline may shift due to client demands or issues like weather, delayed approvals, or coordination problems. Speeding up or adjusting the schedule usually means changing how or when work gets done, which affects cost and planning.
Example: A key tenant wants to move in early, so the owner asks the team to fast-track the interior fit-out. That requires night shifts, more workers, and rush delivery fees.
Construction depends on the availability of materials and skilled labor. If suppliers fall through or trades are booked out, the team might need to make substitutions or rework the schedule.
Example: The specified acoustic panels are backordered for eight weeks. The team sources a similar product, but it needs different mounting hardware and changes to the framing.
Not all change orders follow the same contract path. In large projects, there’s often a distinction between the change orders that affect the owner-contractor agreement and those that affect subcontractors.
A Prime Contract Change Order (PCCO) is a formal change to the agreement between the project owner and the prime contractor (also called the general contractor). PCCOs are similar to standard change orders, but they apply specifically to the prime contract. This is the main contract that governs the overall project.
Like other change orders, PCCOs can:
Even though a PCCO affects only the owner–contractor agreement, the actual work often involves subcontractors. That’s where Commitment Change Orders come in.
A Commitment Change Order (CCO) adjusts the agreement between the prime contractor and a subcontractor. When a PCCO introduces new work—or removes work—the prime contractor may need to revise subcontractor agreements to reflect that change.
CCOs allow the prime contractor to:
In short:
Both types of change orders keep the project aligned as changes are made, but they operate at different levels of the contract chain. When change orders start stacking up, having a clear process—and the right tools—makes all the difference.
Most U.S. construction projects follow standard contract formats that include clearly defined procedures for handling change orders. The most commonly used are the AIA contract documents and ConsensusDocs series, but other forms are also worth understanding.
While each standard varies in structure and terminology, they generally require:
Choosing the right form and following its procedures helps avoid disputes, improves transparency, and supports compliant project delivery.
A change order follows a structured process to ensure the adjustment is documented, reviewed, approved, and implemented correctly. Here’s how a typical construction change order moves from start to finish:
A potential change order starts when someone on the project notices something needs to change. It might be a design issue, an owner request, a site condition, or a building code update.
This step can be triggered by anyone on the project. It could be the owner, architect, contractor, or consultant, as long as it clearly affects the contract’s scope, cost, or schedule.
Once a change is identified, it needs to be reported in writing. Most U.S. contracts (e.g. AIA A201, ConsensusDocs 200) require written notice within a specified period, sometimes within 7 or 14 days.
Notification can come through a Proposal Request, Construction Change Directive (CCD), or Change Order Request (COR). If this step is missed or delayed, the request might be denied later.
After notice is given, review the contract, including general conditions, scope of work, and any change management provisions. Identify any clauses related to timelines for notice, documentation standards, and required forms (e.g., AIA G701, ConsensusDocs 202, or project-specific templates).
The contractor also reviews how the change affects the budget and timeline. This includes estimating material and labor costs, checking subcontractor quotes, and seeing if the change impacts the project schedule.
In federal projects, even more detailed backup is required. Everything must be documented so the owner can see exactly how the numbers were calculated.
Once the pricing and schedule impacts are submitted, the owner or contracting officer decides whether to approve the change.
A change order isn’t valid without written approval. Verbal authorizations are strongly discouraged and often unenforceable. Work cannot proceed until the order is signed by the authorized parties.
If the proposal looks fair and accurate, the change order is approved and becomes part of the contract. If not, it’s rejected or sent back for revision.
When a change is approved, it must be officially recorded. All standard contracts in the U.S. mandate documentation of approved change orders.
Documentation includes the agreed scope, revised drawings/specs, and the updated cost and schedule. These documents become part of the project record and may be reviewed during closeout or audits.
Once approved, the change is reflected in the updated project schedule, subcontractor scopes, and budgets.
Projects often track these updates using software. Everyone involved should be informed so the change is properly integrated into the ongoing work.
If the change affects the contract price, it also affects how payments are handled. This might involve a one-time payment, an adjustment to the next progress claim, or changes to the final invoice. The contract term should clearly explain how and when these adjustments are made.
Unless your contract says so, a change order doesn’t have to follow a specific format. Some contracts require forms like the AIA G701 or ConsensusDocs 202. If not, you can use any format that’s clear, complete, and easy to track.
Whether you’re filling out a template, writing it by hand, or building one in Excel, here are the core items every construction change order should include:
Managing change orders is also a legal and contractual issue. Construction contracts are built around specific procedures that govern how changes must be requested, documented, and approved.
Here are the key legal points to keep in mind when dealing with changes to the work:
Most construction contracts in the United States include a clause that outlines how the scope of work may be revised. Commonly called the “changes in the work” clause, it provides a structured process for modifying the contract and determining how those changes will be priced.
Standard form contracts like the AIA A201-2017 (Article 7) and ConsensusDocs 200 (Article 8) include these provisions as part of the general conditions. They typically require that any changes be documented in writing through a formal change order. Custom contracts may go further by stating that no verbal agreements are valid; only signed, written change orders are binding.
Here’s how the change order process usually works:
That’s the ideal process. But in reality, things are often messier. On active job sites, changes can come up quickly, and there's constant pressure to stay on schedule. So, not every change gets formally documented before the work begins.
So what happens if the proper procedures aren't followed? Can changes still be enforceable? Usually, yes. Even if a contract requires written change orders, courts may still enforce changes made through the parties’ conduct or verbal agreement.
For example, if a project engineer directs a contractor to perform additional work with the understanding that compensation will be sorted out later, the owner can still be obligated to pay, even if nothing was put in writing.
When the contractor and owner can't agree on the terms of a change, the owner can still move forward by issuing a Construction Change Directive (CCD). This allows the owner to unilaterally direct a change in the work, even if the contractor hasn't agreed on the price or schedule adjustment.
Under AIA contracts, the architect determines how much extra time or compensation the contractor is owed for the CCD. If the contractor disagrees, it can file a claim or take legal action. But it must still perform the work. Refusing to do so is considered a breach of contract.
From the owner’s point of view, CCDs are a practical tool for avoiding project delays when negotiations stall. However, they raise legal questions: under common law, contract changes must be mutual and backed by consideration. Still, courts generally uphold CCD provisions.
While owners have broad authority to make changes, that power has limits. The cardinal change doctrine protects contractors from being forced to perform work that goes far beyond the original agreement.
This doctrine applies when a change fundamentally alters the nature of the work that it amounts to a breach of contract by the owner.
For example, if a contractor is hired to build a hotel, and the owner later demands a movie theater instead. That’s not just a change, it’s essentially a new project. The contractor wouldn’t be required to perform the new work, even if the owner issued a CCD.
The doctrine can also apply when multiple change orders, taken together, significantly alter the original scope of the project. That’s why it’s important to step back and assess the cumulative impact of all changes over time.
Project managers play a critical role in managing change orders. They lead the process from start to finish. They review requests, coordinate with teams, track impacts, and make sure everything stays on course.
Without strong oversight, change orders can cause delays, drive up costs, or create conflict. A project manager helps prevent that.
Effective change order management is critical to keeping construction projects on track. These core practices help ensure a structured and efficient process:
Not every project change needs a change order. Sometimes a different tool fits better. Here’s how to tell the difference.
In most cases, these mean the same thing. "Change order" is common in the U.S., while variation in construction is used in places like Australia and the U.K. Both refer to written changes to a construction contract’s scope, cost, or time. The name might change, but the purpose doesn’t.
A contract amendment is broader. It updates the contract itself, not just the work being done. For example, changing payment terms, insurance requirements, or dispute resolution clauses would require an amendment. A change order, on the other hand, sticks to the work: what’s being built, how much it costs, and how long it’ll take.
If you’re drawing from a contingency, you’re still operating within the original contract. You don’t need to issue a change order to use those funds, as long as the work stays within scope.
Contingency covers known risks and small adjustments that were expected from the start. If the work goes beyond that scope or affects time or budget in a bigger way, a change order is the right move.
Save time, speed up reporting with the best automated tools
Get StartedSlash your reporting costs by more than 50%