Safety in Design for Construction Projects: Laws, Tools, and Examples

Learn how safety in design helps make construction projects safer by planning for risks early, using smart design choices, and following safety rules.

Popular

Use this FREE Risk Register Template to identify, track, and treat any risks that could impact your project.

Safety in Design
Back to top

Many construction projects still treat safety as an afterthought, addressing hazards only after the build has started, when changes are costly and limited. Safety in Design (SiD) helps project teams, engineers, and designers shift that thinking.

This guide explains how SiD works, why it's legally required, and what steps you can take to design out risks early. Here, you'll find practical tools, principles, and examples to improve safety, compliance, and performance from the start.

TL;DR
Safety in Design removes hazards early, improves site safety, and meets WHS Regulation 295. It applies across design, construction, use, and demolition. Tools like risk registers help teams document decisions, reduce delays, and manage compliance.

What is Safety in Design (SiD)?

Safety in Design (Sid) is the process of identifying and eliminating hazards during the early design phase of a construction project. The goal is to reduce safety risks before work begins, not after issues arise on site.

This proactive approach ensures that safety is considered into how a structure is built, used, maintained, and eventually demolished. It forms the foundation of safe design principles in the construction industry.

In Australia, SiD is a legal requirement. Under WHS Regulation 295, designers must consider the health and safety of anyone who interacts with a structure throughout the project lifecycle, including workers, maintenance personnel, and demolition teams.

By applying Safety in Design during the design stage, teams can eliminate or minimise foreseeable hazards, reduce reliance on reactive controls, and improve compliance, efficiency, and long-term outcomes.

Why Safety in Design Matters

Design decisions directly affect construction work safety. According to research published by Safe Work Australia, approximately 37% of work-related fatalities in construction were linked to design issues that could have been prevented with safer design practices.

When safety is considered early, hazards can often be eliminated altogether. That means fewer incidents, fewer delays, and fewer costs tied to redesign, injury, or reactive fixes on site.

Good design also leads to better workflows, improved safety standards, and easier maintenance, benefits that last well beyond the construction phase. In short, safe design saves lives, time, and money.

Beyond improving safety outcomes, strong Safety in Design practices can also help you win work. Many clients expect clear safety documentation when evaluating tenders. Showing that your team designs with user safety in mind can give you an edge in a competitive bid environment.

Key Principles of Safety in Design

Before putting Safety in Design into action, it's important to understand the principles that guide it. These form the foundation for every decision made during the design phase of a construction project:

  • Eliminate risk where reasonably practicable: Always aim to remove a hazard at its source through design. This is more effective and sustainable than relying on administrative controls or personal protective equipment later in the process.
  • Consider the full lifecycle: Design decisions should account for every stage of the structure from construction and use, to maintenance and eventual demolition. A safe design remains safe across time and changing conditions.
  • Design for user safety: Go beyond construction workers. The design must protect everyone who interacts with the structure, including maintenance workers, facility users, and emergency responders.
  • Use the hierarchy of controls: Follow a structured approach to managing risks. Start by attempting to eliminate hazards, then substitute, isolate, or control them using engineering solutions before resorting to signage, procedures, or PPE.
  • Embed collaboration early: Safety improves when all relevant parties share insights from the start. Collaborative planning leads to safer, more buildable outcomes.
  • Document decisions: Clearly record why specific design choices were made, especially if risks couldn’t be eliminated. Documentation ensures that downstream duty holders know what hazards remain and how to manage them.

These principles align with Safe Work Australia’s guidance on safe design and form the basis of a compliant, practical, and forward-thinking design process.

The 10-Step Safety in Design Process

These ten steps outline how to systematically integrate safety into the design process. Each one plays a role in identifying and reducing risks before construction begins.

10-step Safety in Design process for reducing risk in construction projects
10-step Safety in Design process helps teams reduce risk before construction.

Step 1. Know the Law

Understand your WHS obligations, including national and state-specific duties. This step ensures your design complies with legal requirements from the start.

Step 2. Start Early

Begin applying SiD principles in the concept phase, before design decisions are locked in. Early action maximises your ability to influence safe outcomes.

Step 3. Work as a Team

Engage project owners, engineers, end-users, and contractors in the design process. Their insights improve hazard identification and solution development.

Step 4. Gather Information

Review existing reports, conduct site visits, and identify hazards specific to location, use, and future maintenance.

Step 5. Assess the Risks

Apply formal risk assessment methods like HAZID or CHAIR to evaluate likelihood and consequence of each potential risk.

Step 6. Apply the Hierarchy of Controls

Aim to eliminate risks first. If not possible, use engineering or administrative controls to reduce them.

Step 7. Consult and Communicate

Discuss safety decisions with others and record the outcomes. Good communication prevents knowledge gaps.

Step 8. Document the Process

Keep a Design Risk Register up to date. This shows what hazards have been considered and how they’re being managed.

Step 9. Transfer Knowledge

Clearly communicate any remaining risks to contractors and maintenance workers. This ensures safety measures are followed during construction and operation.

Step 10. Learn from Experience

After project completion, gather feedback and document lessons learned to improve safety outcomes in future designs.

To make Safety in Design practical, it helps to see how the 10 steps align with construction project design phases. This table maps out what to do and when so you can apply the right tools and actions at each stage.

Design Phase Key SiD Steps Tools & Practices
Pre-Design Know the law, gather information Site inspections, checklists
Concept Design Start early, collaborate SiD scopes, workshops
Schematic Design Risk assessment, controls HAZID, brainstorming
Detailed Design Document and consult Risk registers, CHAIR/HAZOP
Pre-Construction Transfer knowledge, learn from feedback Final SiD reports, annotated drawings

Key Technologies and Tools in Safety in Design

Once you’ve mapped your SiD process, you’ll need the right tools to support it. These help your team assess risks, document decisions, and communicate safety clearly at every stage.

Core Documentation Tools

These are the essential tools every project team should use to document safety decisions, track risks, and meet compliance requirements.

  • Design Risk Register: Tracks hazards, control measures, and design decisions throughout the project. Helps teams meet legal requirements and ensure risks are reviewed and updated as the design evolves.
  • Safety in Design Checklist: Confirms that typical safety risks have been considered at each stage. Reduces the chance of overlooking key issues during reviews.
  • SiD Report Template: Summarises any residual risks and outlines how they’ll be managed. Used to inform downstream parties and meet regulatory handover requirements.

Digital Tools and Technologies

These tools use technology to improve how safety is reviewed, communicated, and controlled during the design process.

  • BIM Software: 3D modelling tools that help visualise the structure and detect spatial hazards. Improves collaboration and early risk identification.
  • AI & Automation: Scans design models to identify safety concerns before construction starts. Supports faster, smarter design reviews.
  • Digital Twins: Simulated models that show how a structure will perform across its lifecycle. Useful for planning safe operations and maintenance.
  • Real-Time Dashboards: Platforms that track live project data to monitor emerging safety risks. Help teams manage actions and ensure accountability.
  • Generative Design Tools: Suggest layout options that meet safety rules and project constraints. Helps teams avoid design decisions that create hazards.

Safety in Design Law: WHS Act & Regulation 295

Under the Model Work Health and Safety (WHS) Act and Regulation 295, anyone who influences design in construction must eliminate or minimise risks so far as is reasonably practicable. This includes designers, engineers, consultants, and others involved in shaping a structure.

The law requires duty holders to consult with clients, contractors, and other stakeholders throughout the design process. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties.

To demonstrate compliance, designers must maintain two key documents such as design Design Risk Register and Safety in Design (SiD) Report. These records help demonstrate legal accountability and support safer outcomes across the construction lifecycle.

The responsibilities under SiD law vary depending on your role. The layout below shows how designers, engineers, clients, and contractors each contribute to compliance and risk control.

Role-based responsibilities summary for Safety in Design in construction projects
Clear role-based responsibilities help teams apply Safety in Design effectively.

Safety in Design vs Related Safety Design Concepts

SiD is part of a broader family of safety-focused design approaches. Here's how it compares to related concepts like Safety by Design, Safe Design, and Safety through Design:

Feature Safety in Design Safety by Design Safe Design Safety through Design
Scope Construction-specific in Australia Broad principle across all industries General term for safety-integrated design Principle applied in industrial sectors
Legal Framework Required under WHS Act & Regulation 295 Generally non-legislative Used in policy and guidance Informal but widely adopted
Application Structures, infrastructure, buildings Products, systems, workplaces Various industries inc. construction Machinery and workplace design
Key Focus Risk management through structure lifecycle Embedding safety in any design Eliminating hazards proactively Preventing hazards before occurrence
Common Roles Designers, architects, PM consultants Engineers, manufacturers, system designers Designers, safety pros, engineers Designers, engineers, safety pros

Safety in Design vs Risk Assessment

While both are essential for managing hazards, this comparison highlights the proactive vs reactive nature of each approach, this section compares two key approaches:

Feature Risk Assessment Safety in Design (SiD)
Timing During or after construction starts Before design decisions are locked in
Approach Reactive: controls existing risks Proactive: eliminates or minimises risks early
Method Identify hazards, apply controls Design out hazards altogether where possible
Tools Used SWMS, JSA, inspections Design reviews, risk registers, SiD workshops
Focus Task-level risks Whole-of-structure and lifecycle safety

Safety in Design Examples: Case Studies

These case studies highlight how different approaches to design, construction risk management, and hazard identification can either prevent or contribute to serious safety issues in construction projects.

Case Study 1: Designing for Safer Assembly and Construction

According to the Australian Constructors Association report, one project involved designing a structure so it could be assembled in self-supporting sections. This allowed construction crews to work progressively, keeping crane lifts within safe reach and reducing the need for temporary props. These design choices helped minimise trip hazards and the need to work at height.

Subcontractors and suppliers were engaged early to review installation sequences, leading to safer, more practical solutions. The project achieved a high H&S risk control score (HOC score of 4.2), showing how collaboration and proactive planning can significantly improve site safety.

Case Study 2: When Safety Risks Are Missed

A shopping centre travelator collapse in Queensland revealed major safety issues.  According to the Office of the Work Health and Safety Prosecutor Queensland, the incident resulted in a serious injury and a $100,000 fine for the engineering firm responsible.

The design failed to account for machinery load and structural stress during installation. No clear control measures were documented. Moreover, communication gaps led to missed warning. This is a reminder of why early risk assessment and adherence to safety standards are essential.

Key Takeaways from Both Projects

These two case studies highlight what can go right and wrong when Safety in Design is applied  during early project planning. Here's what they reveal:

  • Early design choices matter: Designing for safer assembly and reducing reliance on temporary supports can eliminate multiple on-site risks.
  • Engaging stakeholders early improves outcomes: Input from subcontractors and suppliers led to better sequencing and reduced safety issues in Case Study 1.
  • Lack of risk planning can lead to failure: Case Study 2 shows how missing load calculations and poor communication can result in serious incidents.
  • Documentation and hazard reviews are critical: Missed control measures can lead to injury, fines, and reputational damage.

These examples reinforce a simple truth: good design choices made early can prevent incidents, save costs, and deliver safer, more resilient projects.

Final Word: Safety in Design Pays Off

Safety in Design pays off by reducing risks, cutting down on costly redesigns, and improving safety outcomes on site. This leads to safer builds, fewer delays, and stronger project outcomes. By prioritising Safety in Design, you help ensure that every project phase runs more safely and smoothly.

Related Articles on 

Safety in Design

See All

Powering Construction Project Management with easy-to-use tools